On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:45:16PM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:23:38AM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote: > > > Actually, I don't really see the benefit of this port. But there was > > > a request for it and it seemed like little effort to maintain it ;) > > Per quoted above, it should not be added. Contrary to GNU versions of sed > > and awk, if base ed(1) can be used as drop-in replacement, over-populating > > ports collection just because someone wanted to remain their work in the > > history does not warrant it. I believe the best would be to follow up with > > maintainer and either 1) find out and explain in pkg-descr what this port > > can do that base ed(1) cannot; or 2) cvs rm it. > > It is not a question of a maintainer wanting their name in the tree. > I'm the maintainer of this port now - and my name is in enough locations > as it is.
Ah, sorry, I somehow got under impression that someone submitted the shar to you for commit. > I'll try and find out what the added value of this version is, and will > remove it again if there isn't any. Thanks. ./danfe _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
