On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:55:24AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Daniel Eischen <[email protected]> wrote: > > deischen 2012-02-03 08:51:32 UTC > > > > Added files: > > editors/nedit/files patch-util-misc.c > > Log: > > Add a patch file to prevent nedit from crashing on file->open or > > file->save operations. > > Is there a reason this patch has not been committed upstream or is > this temporary until the next release?
I concur. While it's very tempting to fix FreeBSD port (especially when it's maintained by you (not you == Daniel, but in general sense)) we should always first contact upstream maintainers/vendor and submit a fix and (at best) ask for review. In case upstream maintainers are not very responsive, but fix is critical or trivial enough, it's OK to fix such port directly, but upstream bug tracker should be filled with detailed bug description and attached patch. ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
