On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:03:04AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 04:14:49 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Right, sorry I didn't catch the point originally from mi@. I was > > viewing the issue from a limited angle. Doug pointed out exact > > deficiency in my thinking and provided real scenario when it can be a > > bummer (that is, if one wants to hold shlib dependency while being > > able to chase updates of the leaf ports). > > Hm, I guess you missed mi@'s mention of such a scenario a few days ago, > in the very same thread that I noted earlier in this discussion: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073262.html
True, I must admit that I missed this piece. Thanks for the pointers again and sorry for giving you a hard time. Sometimes I am slow and dumb. :-) ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
