On 03/02/2012 01:20, Florian Smeets wrote:
> On 02.03.2012 10:15, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Would '${LN} -sf' have been a safer choice?
>
> Why safer? What if someone has a link pointing to another cert file?
> ${LN} -sf would just overwrite it. Now we only create the link if it's
> not there. IMHO the safest choice for all cases, no?
If the user chooses that option, the port should own the link. Having
the link point to a stale location is infinitely more likely than the
user choosing that option but not intending it to actually happen.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
