-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:12:15PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake: >On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:41:35PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Eitan Adler thus spake: >> >On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval. >> >> However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I >> >> believe >> >> isn't necessary the maintainer approval. >> > >> >portmgr or secteam still needs to approve. >> > >> > >> Not only was this a bugfix, but it also covered a CVE. Is that still >> required for a timeout? >> >> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/23/15 >> >> I also added this to a note on this pr: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165035 >> >> That being said, is there going to be a vuxml write-up for this commit? >> >> -jgh >> >> -- >> Jason Helfman >> FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve > >If there a security fix just go ahead and commit along with a vuxml entry. > >regards, >Bapt
I've committed the entry. The port was already updated, but fixed and closed the pr. - -jgh - -- Jason Helfman FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvsj7AAoJECBZmmNBUNPcQOEIALHVSwYISzLDbmrReLyw3aZK 6QvE3eaNcw+aRIGT4SsUbKWIVrWj0zurs5l5h9jgVv2EJB/gjRTU0Drw0wIllXVB FyYq/BbOrs6x5BP1WhtLNU4+xVzRZLfr1RICbtw02p6YUujazomAFX8MYObtACk7 7z5L7DBuKzkEnHkEUntO+McdHpE79w10gS2VVeJC2Rjiy888D5rRqbgsY4es5Z7z 3UbcvSFxiGzWVeQ+TdbzwVMdxaj9a8cGSgz77v56VGkTKPuoLwowi8RfqNeX2rP6 htBL02mIn0TNYvALr82hUuwEzD+2/JyqoDzg+8Q/jXBawkfqTB2nZX7i67Utvfg= =wT57 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
