Hi, >>>>> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:39:47 -0400 (EDT) >>>>> Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
deischen> Great work, but is there a reason why this is called cached instead deischen> of nscd? There is prior precedent (Linux, Solaris) for nscd and deischen> nscd.conf, and cached is just too general. cached(8) doesn't do actuall lookup like nscd(8) does, basically. So, I feel awkward to call cached(8) nscd(8). However, it might be too general as you say. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED],jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
