On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:00:32PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:05:20 +0200 > Marc Fonvieille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > > > Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > > >On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 01:00:00PM +0000, Remko Lodder wrote: > > > >>remko 2006-05-28 13:00:00 UTC > > > >> > > > >> FreeBSD doc repository > > > >> > > > >> Modified files: > > > >> en/docproj todo.sgml > > > >> Log: > > > >> Add a TODO item for updating the -entire- handbook from 4.X to 5.X and > > > >> later, while leaving the 4.X information on the background. > > > > > > > >I may be wrong but it seems this doesn't help and collides with other > > > >next items in the list. If some parts need an update they must be > > > >clearly mentioned, this would help to know where some changes are > > > >needed. 4.X support should be dropped and not reorganized; since > > > >4.11-RELEASE Handbook is available at http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/ there > > > >is no need, most of time, to talk about 4.X. > > > > > > > >Marc > > > > > > So you are waving the flag: Kill the 4.X specific stuff? Since that > > > would make my life much easier as the only remaining translator > > > for the NL project... > > > > The first lines of the Handbook say: > > "This handbook covers the installation and day to day use of FreeBSD > > 5.5-RELEASE and FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE." We should not worry about 4.X > > when it does not bring anything interesting; "old things" must be > > updated when they still exist in 5.X, etc. > > If everyone is cool with it, I'd love to see all the "Note in > 4.X do this" comments nuked. :)
I thought that we had already agreed to do this as things are updated.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
pgpLttm3XHQzL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
