On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:18:08AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > I presume this was triggered by the recent thread on -ports > encouraging people to take ownership of unloved ports. Unfortunately, > this (and the other FreeBSD compat ports) are exceptions where the > general rule that "maintainer = ports implies unloved" doesn't hold.
Right. There are a few ports that are considered "key ports" that in the past we have wanted only handled by senior developers who are aware of all the possible complications. There is no hard-and-fast rule for this. I'm sorry if the original claimant wasn't aware of this. mcl _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
