On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:51:40 -0600 (MDT) "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:41, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > : On Tuesday 20 June 2006 14:53, David O'Brien wrote: > : > : > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > : > : > > Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the > : > : > > world target with just a message: > : > : > > > : > : > > "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." > : > : > > : > : > No! > : > : > > : > : > 'make world' is still my normal building process. Why force > : > : > "make buildworld && make installworld"?? > : > : > > : > : > I don't care how undocumented it is, or obfusacted > : > : > 'HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD' is; but please leave them alone! > : > : > > : > : > thanks for your attention. > : > : > : > : You can already get that via 'make DESTDIR=/ world' you know. :) And > : that's > : > : shorter to type. > : > > : > It has been pointed out to me that you can't put DESTDIR=/ in your > : > /etc/make.conf file; however, you can put HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD=y in > : > there. > : > : Fair enough. How about just making it undocumented again then? :) > > Works for me. Doesn't work here. Sorry. It's fine that the options stay there, but personally, I can understand why some users would be pissed about this being undocumented. If I started a build and expected it to run all night, seen it bombed in the morning, well ... Yea, I'd be pissed too. :) -- Tom Rhodes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
