* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060620 13:31] wrote: > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 14:53, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the > > > world target with just a message: > > > > > > "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." > > > > No! > > > > 'make world' is still my normal building process. Why force > > "make buildworld && make installworld"?? > > > > I don't care how undocumented it is, or obfusacted > > 'HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD' is; but please leave them alone! > > > > thanks for your attention. > > You can already get that via 'make DESTDIR=/ world' you know. :) And that's > shorter to type.
I think I'm missing something. Is the only difference between "make world" and: "make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld" That make world has the order of installs flipped? -- - Alfred Perlstein - coder / sysadmin / FreeBSD Hacker / All that jazz - _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
