Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:28:04 +0200 Erwin Lansing wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:19:07AM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: >>> Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: >>> >>>> That's great. Thanks. >>> And probably useless to prevent any spam. > >> Not probably, but certainly. The address will still be listed in GNATS, >> the Makefile, several mailinglists, just to name some. It doesn't gives >> us any prevention against spam and only goes to make working with commit >> logs harder. Although there is no maintainer for Tools/, I also dislike >> this kind of drive-by commits to such widely used tools without prior >> discussion. > > And it is documented: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#Q12.6.3. > ----- > 12.6.3. Are there any other files I am not allowed to touch? > > Any file directly under ports/, or any file under a subdirectory that > starts with an uppercase letter (Mk/, Tools/, etc.). In particular, > the ports management team is very protective of ports/Mk/bsd.port*.mk > so do not commit changes to those files unless you want to face his > wra(i)th.
I think it's obsoleted. These days only bsd.port*.mk are strongly protected. Moreover I'm sure Renato is a person who can make addport better. His change-pr script rocks! :-) -- Dixi. Sem. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
