On Thursday 06 July 2006 18:21, Scott Long wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday 06 July 2006 17:53, Scott Long wrote: > > > >>John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >>>jhb 2006-07-06 21:42:36 UTC > >>> > >>> FreeBSD src repository > >>> > >>> Modified files: > >>> sys/amd64/linux32 syscalls.master > >>> sys/compat/linux linux_ioctl.c > >>> sys/i386/linux syscalls.master > >>> Log: > >>> - Protect the list of linux ioctl handlers with an sx lock. > >>> - Hold Giant while calling linux ioctl handlers for now as they aren't > > > > all > > > >>> known to be MPSAFE yet. > >>> - Mark linux_ioctl() MPSAFE. > >>> > >>> Revision Changes Path > >>> 1.15 +1 -1 src/sys/amd64/linux32/syscalls.master > >>> 1.137 +17 -0 src/sys/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.c > >>> 1.72 +1 -1 src/sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master > >> > >>Why not add the small bit of infrastucture so that modules can declare > >>their handlers as MPSAFE or not? There are certainly some drivers that > >>would benefit from this. > > > > > > We can certainly do that. I'm up to at least 3 places that this could be > > done now: > > > > - module event handlers > > - sysinit's > > - linux_ioctl handlers > > > > For now my focus is on eliminating syscall mpsafe flag, and most syscalls > > can be made Giant free at this point, but for a few Giant is just being > > pushed part of the way in. > > > > What I'm afraid of is that these things will get forgotten now that they > have been pushed out of the way. Are you interested in taking the next > step here?
I've put it on a list, but if someone else wants to do it first that would be fine by me. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
