On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Daniel O'Connor wrote:

On Monday 24 July 2006 12:28, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
ktrace is a good disk filling service if you run it like this.

truss IS more convenient.

If kdump could write to a pipe it would be almost as convenient.

Oh, and one more thing.. Ktrace is almost useless "out of the box" because for any non-trivial operation you run out of requests.

I usually have to bump up kern.ktrace.request_pool by an order of magnitude.

This has been fixed in 7.x, but I did not MFC it before 6.1 because I wanted it to see more testing. We probably should MFC it for 6.2.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to