In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I think the problem is inherent when the existence of the variable
: counts and not its value. It's not intuitive and people use it in
: different ways because of that. I personally like something simple
: like SHARED=NO or SHARED=YES. The lack of definition then meaning
: the default setting. This is trivially implemented with SHARED?=YES.
: Anyway: that's just me...
NO_SHARED=no has been a long-running joke around the office. However,
going to a simple SHARED=?yes/no won't work either. It is
inconsistant with the new world order. I'd expecte that
MK_SHARED=yes/no would be the right thing to do, but there may be
parse time issues that makes it hard to do this simple fix..
Warner
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
