If memory serves me right, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:33:07AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: >> If memory serves me right, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:39:00PM +0000, Bruce A. Mah wrote: >>>> bmah 2006-07-25 21:39:00 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD src repository >>>> >>>> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) >>>> release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml >>>> Log: >>>> MFC: Minidumps, padlock(7) VIA C7 support, enc(4), sysinstall(8) menu >>>> titles. >>> padlock(4) in RELENG_6 doesn't support new crypto stuff available in VIA >>> C7. In RELENG_6 it only supports AES encryption. I'm planning to MFC >>> this, but with the whole work I did for crypto(9) and various crypto >>> drivers and I don't think I'll make it before 6.2. >> Thanks for pointing this out. Given how the text reads now... >> >> <para>The &man.padlock.4; driver now supports the cryptographic >> functionality of the VIA C7 processor.</para> >> >> ...do you think it would be better to say something like "...supports >> the AES encryption functions..." or just leave this out altogether? > > It think we should just remove this entry. AFAIK padlock(4) recognized > also VIA C7 CPUs before, there was just no information about this in the > manual page. Michael, can you confirm this? > > If VIA C7 was not recognized by padlock(4) from 6.0/6.1, we should add > the info you proposed: > > The padlock(4) driver now supports the AES encryption functions of the > VIA C7 processor.
I finally nuked this entry. Sorry it took so long...I somehow filed this email in the wrong folder. Thanks! Bruce.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
