At 8:48 AM -0400 8/31/06, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 06:18, Tom Rhodes wrote:
 On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:00:04 +0400
 > Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 > > No, /etc/defaults are different beasties -- they are true
 > default config files -- they are either used if there's no
 > corresponding version under /etc, or most likely sourced
 > to provide defaults.  To be moved to /etc/defaults, a file
 > should gain the same property.

 While this comment is blatently obvious: /etc/examples

This is already spelled /usr/share/examples/etc in FreeBSD.

Actually, as it stands right now that is not quite the same
thing.  Right now /usr/share/examples/etc holds *exact copies*
of the files we install in /etc, for the reasons as described
in /usr/share/examples/etc/README.examples :

   The /usr/share/examples/etc directory contains the original
   distribution versions of the files which are shipped in /etc.
   This is intended to make it easy to recover when the /etc
   versions are accidentally deleted or broken beyond repair.

We can obviously change the intent of that directory, but I
noticed that README as I was writing my previous message, and
I wasn't sure if we would want to change the present intent.
(which is why I said nothing about it in my previous message)

One other observation:  The directory /usr/share/examples/pf
holds several files, which are several different examples of
how someone might want to setup 'pf'.  But /etc/pf.conf (and
the duplicate in /usr/share/examples/etc/pf.conf ) give one
specific example that "the project" recommends as a starting
point.  I have no idea if that is a significant distinction,
I'm just noticing that we seem to have that subtle distinction.

/etc/defaults would just be wrong for examples, that directory
is for default settings (note that /etc/defaults/rc.conf is not
just comments, but sets default values for various settings..
same with /etc/defaults/periodic.conf, etc.)

That is a good point.  I would also be happy with putting such
files in a new /etc/examples directory.  One advantage to
having them all in a directory is that projects like nanobsd
can safely remove the entire directory, and know that nothing
will be broken by doing that.

So I have no strong opinion about where the example files should
go, just as long as the real file includes a pointer to that
location.  I slightly favor "somewhere under /etc" for the
reasons I listed earlier, but would also be happy enough if
they show up in /usr/share/examples .

--
Garance Alistair Drosehn     =               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Programmer               or   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;             Troy, NY;  USA
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to