On Tuesday 05 September 2006 16:02, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > >>> (That is, are there any such places. If so, you > >>> just broke them.) > >> No, I believe that I did not, unless you can provide example of the > >> contrary. > > > > linprocfs, but it lies anyway. I've engaged in hacks like this in 4.x, > > That's what I mean - I can't imagine how can you get any useful > statistics out of CPU times by combining it with number of processors. > > > but I think they are just that: hacks. I think a real fix is to support > > turning off CPUs in the MI code and allow userland to query via a non-hackish > > interface how many CPUs are actually enabled and get appropriate load stats, > > etc. based on that. > > Yes, that's would be nice. But in the meantime my goal is to resolve > obvious regression we have in the 6.x release in the presence of the HTT > CPU.
It's not a regression I think as 4.x and 5.x both do the same as before this commit (IIRC), but that's ok. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
