On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:49:53 +0400 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 10/5/06, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > bsam 2006-10-05 15:32:10 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > emulators/linux_base-fc4 Makefile > > emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 Makefile > > emulators/linux_base-suse-9.2 Makefile > > emulators/linux_base-suse-9.3 Makefile > > emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage1 Makefile > > emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage2 Makefile > > emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 Makefile > > x11/linux-XFree86-libs Makefile > > Log: > > Remove deleted linux_base-* and linux_locale* ports from CONFLICTS > > variable > > of the remaining linux ports. > > > > Reviewed by: netchild (agreed in principle)
> IMHO, you really shouldn't do that. People with old packages > installed should not worry about trying out new ports. Now you've > opened a way for their systems to be messed up. Well, we are speaking about already deleted ports. Once they were deleted and user's ports tree updated any adding/removing should be done according to /usr/ports/UPDATING (i.e. reading about default linux_base port and how to upgrade). Once a user uses fixed ports tree and pre-built packages there should be no problems. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
