On Mon, 2006-Oct-30 17:39:54 +0800, LI Xin wrote: >Well thought, I think that you are correct that specifying -P should do >nothing but generate a warning. > >In addition to this I have changed the behavior a bit (patch attached) >that, if -f is specified along with -P, the overwritten is happen and >the link would be removed. Please let me know if you are happy with >this change.
I prefer this patch to what was committed. It still has foot-shooting potential but I don't believe that there have been massive screams about the current -P behaviour so presumably not too many people have accidently destroyed the content of a file they still wanted when deleting an unwanted link to the file. IMHO, rm.1 should explicitly state that "rm -fP" on a multi-linked file will destry the file contents as seen via the remaining link(s). This probably belongs in the "NOTE" section. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpUsyCXUQ3Ex.pgp
Description: PGP signature
