On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:54:51AM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > jb 2006-11-01 04:54:51 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/amd64/amd64 genassym.c > sys/arm/arm genassym.c > sys/i386/i386 genassym.c > sys/ia64/ia64 genassym.c > sys/kern subr_prf.c tty_cons.c > sys/powerpc/powerpc genassym.c > sys/sparc64/sparc64 genassym.c > sys/sys cons.h pcpu.h > Log: > Add a cnputs() function to write a string to the console with > a lock to prevent interspersed strings written from different CPUs > at the same time.
Nice, this was very annoying, but I'd still like to have a recursive
lock, which could be used by printf(9) consumers. For example, I'm not
able to implement such macro in a way that ensure everything will be
printed in one line:
#define G_MIRROR_DEBUG(lvl, ...) do { \
if (g_mirror_debug >= (lvl)) { \
printf("GEOM_MIRROR"); \
if (g_mirror_debug > 0) \
printf("[%u]", lvl); \
printf(": "); \
printf(__VA_ARGS__); \
printf("\n"); \
} \
} while (0)
What I'd like is a global printf_lock which will allow me to put many
separate printfs under it and be sure it won't be messed up by other
CPUs. Having it recursive could also eliminate the need for per-CPU
buffers, as I don't think we care about performance here.
What do you think?
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
pgpnH7Yc5RMVH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
