On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:49:15AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:26:41PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:05:29AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Why can't you just check for the defined constant? > > > > To clarify: it is a run-time issue, not a compile-time issue. The > > application will compile fine regardless of the above patch, but > > without the above patch (and with ukbd/uhid loaded) the application > > will fail to attach to the device. > > > You want to build a port only when you know that the kernel has > this fix?
That is my intention, yes. Otherwise end-users will likely be confused as to why the application fails to detect their device. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpn6U2s8o0oU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
