On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:44:41PM +0000, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> > What makes these sctp_* syscalls so special as opposed to their
> > generic and protocol agnostic counterparts?
> They're used for operations which do not have a direct correspondence in
> the existing functions, i.e. connecting to multihomed peers, and dealing
> with one-to-many sockets.
i think Andre's question was this:
normally we use {set|get}sockopt() to configure the socket
as desired for special features (e.g. multicast is one).
Why is it undesirable to use the same kind of overloading
for sctp ?
cheers
luigi
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"