On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:51:30 -0500 John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 15 December 2006 14:45, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > > > Andre Oppermann wrote: > > >> > > >> What makes these sctp_* syscalls so special as opposed to their > > >> generic and protocol agnostic counterparts? > > > They're used for operations which do not have a direct correspondence in > > > the existing functions, i.e. connecting to multihomed peers, and dealing > > > with one-to-many sockets. > > > > > > See Section 9.3-9.12, UNIX Network Programming Vol 1 3e for more info. > > > > > > generally we would use socket ops or ioctls for this sort of thing.. > > syscalls is not how they would normally be done.... > > I'll give a free paper cookie to the first person to actually go _read_ the > committed code and notice that, *tada*, aside from the sctp_send*(), and > sctp_recvmsg() functions, these are indeed library wrapper functions around > getsockopt() and setsockopt(). > Adding useless fodder, I must say ... "John for the win" -- Tom Rhodes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
