On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:54:43 -0800 Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cy Schubert > write > s: > > cy 2007-01-14 05:13:32 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > security/krb5 Makefile > > Log: > > Include new documentation dependencies. > > > > Conditionally build and install documentation using a new knob. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.109 +12 -2 ports/security/krb5/Makefile > > I've received a couple of complaints so far from folks who aren't enamoured > with the fact that texinfo or teTeX, and dvips are required to build the > MIT KRB5 port. I've put a knob in the port to disable building and > installing MIT's KRB5 documentation. Do people prefer to have the > documentation installed by default with MIT KRB5 or would folks rather have > the documentation only installed when specified in a make option? Ideally you should provide a separate port krb5-doc, so that people do not need to rebuild krb5 if they want to install the documentation. Moreover, it would allow to install the documentation from a package. -- Jean-Yves Lefort [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lefort.be.eu.org/
pgpKAnuHvHQYp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
