On 3/9/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:21:55AM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> >That's been the policy as long as I know.
>
> We've had a thread in November about this with
> no particular ending. Did I miss anything?
AFAIAC it's the policy.
Right, but we're not alone. I'm not against putting
additional info in CVS (I would prefer this to be
automated, though), but unless it's set in stone
many committers will continue to choose the easiest
way - do nothing.
How else, on repocopies, can you tell from the
CVS logs what happened?
This is a workaround for the obsolete model that
CVS has.
We survived enough repocopies without any special
forced commits to know that they are not vital.
Committer's Guide [1] does not suggest them.
[1]
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/article.html#AEN1335
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
