In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:29:44PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:13:30AM +0000, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
: > > pjd 2007-04-06 02:13:30 UTC
: > >
: > > FreeBSD src repository
: > >
: > > Modified files:
: > > . Makefile.inc1
: > > etc/mtree BSD.root.dist
: > > share/mk bsd.own.mk
: > > sys/modules Makefile
: > > tools/build/mk OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
: > > Added files:
: > > tools/build/options WITHOUT_ZFS
: > > Log:
: > > Connect ZFS to the build.
: >
: > Much as I love ZFS, shouldn't this default to off, being CDDL'd and all?
:
: Don't we build GNU/GPL tools by default? Don't we build GNU/GPL kernel
: modules by default? The only concern is not to include ZFS into our
: GENERIC kernel.
Yes. That's the policy of the project. I double checked Pawel's
defaults before he committed, and they seemed sane to me.
The project has made a policy decision to treat CDDL code like we
treat GPL'd code for the time being. This is the first set of CDDL
code to hit the tree, and I believe it implements this policy.
Warner
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
