Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Dag-Erling SmÞrgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>   Log:
>>>>   Fix USE_XLIB to depend on stub file rather than libX11.
>>> Is this intended as a permanent solution?  I realize that having
>>> USE_XLIB the way it is allows us to support both X.org and XFree86, but
>>> I would much prefer to see USE_XLIB replaced with something similar to
>>> USE_XORG, explicitly listing the required libraries.
>> No this is not permanent. Once we removed XFree86-4, we'll start
>> removing USE_XLIB in favor of USE_XORG.
> 
> OK, I didn't realize we were going to remove XFree86 altogether
> 
> (for the record, I'm in favor)
> 
> Extending the USE_XLIB syntax would still be useful, as it would allow
> maintainers to start migrating to the new syntax while remaining
> compatible with XFree86-4, but it's not a big deal.

That would actually be a good idea, this way we could start marking
USE_XLIB as deprecated in portlint and migrating USE_XLIB=yes to
USE_XORG="foo bar".

Let's just set USE_XLIB=yes if X_WINDOW_SYSTEM == xfree86-4 and USE_XORG
is defined.

DES or I could prepare a bpm patch for this if there's an empty slot on
pointyhat for a new exp-run.

-- 
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to