2007/6/5, Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, John Baldwin wrote:
I believe we also should replace thread_lock() and thread_unlock() with calls to spinlock_enter()/exit() on !SMP and make thread_set_lock() a no-op for this case. Does that sounds right to everyone?
Yes, this sounds fair. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
