On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:58:30PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Kris Kennaway p??e v st 06. 06. 2007 v 17:51 -0400: > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:47:49PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > Kris Kennaway p??e v st 06. 06. 2007 v 17:41 -0400: > > > > > > > What was decided was to only update in batches when x.org makes a new > > > > "kamikaze" release (or whatever they are calling it ;), unless there > > > > is a really good reason to update a port otherwise. > > > > > > Well, I will try to make updates clustered to minimize the trashing. > > > There is currently five libs with outdated ports, and a slew of apps. > > > (I guess apps are not a concern, only protos and libs.) > > > > No, please follow the above rule. You were not involved in the x.org > > 7 integration but it was agreed upon by those of us who were. > > Well, okay, I'll stay away from x11@ then.
Your choice. You (and everyone else) are welcome to help, but pursuing "feature leetness" by aggressively tracking every new minor package version is not helping. Kris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
