On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:05:22 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:02:34AM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:01:33AM +0000, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > > > > alepulver 2007-06-07 04:01:33 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Makefile distinfo > > > Added files: > > > sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files extra-patch-ublio > > > patch-libntfs-3g__device.c > > > patch-libntfs-3g__unix_io.c > > > pkg-message.in > > > Removed files: > > > sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files patch-libntfs-3g-device_io.c > > > patch-src-ntfs-3g.c unix_io_raw.c > > > > Why did you rename patch files? Please back this out. > > This is not the first time I've seen people rename existing patch files, > while IIRC current policy tells us to abstain from doing so. Only new > files are subject to new (more strict) naming rules. Let's follow the > guidelines. > Hello. I think there has been a misunderstanding here: the removed patch file is for device_io.c, and the added one for device.c which are different files with different sets of changes. Best Regards, Ale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
