On 6/14/07, Cheng-Lung Sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
clsung 2007-06-14 02:41:41 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
security Makefile
Added files:
security/php-Auth_OpenID Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
Log:
Add php-Auth_OpenID 1.2.2, PHP OpenID library.
PR: ports/112079
Submitted by: Gea-Suan Lin <gslin at gslin.org>
Revision Changes Path
1.891 +1 -0 ports/security/Makefile
1.1 +58 -0 ports/security/php-Auth_OpenID/Makefile (new)
1.1 +3 -0 ports/security/php-Auth_OpenID/distinfo (new)
1.1 +5 -0 ports/security/php-Auth_OpenID/pkg-descr (new)
1.1 +62 -0 ports/security/php-Auth_OpenID/pkg-plist (new)
+RUN_DEPENDS= pear:${PORTSDIR}/devel/pear
+BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS}
I think I pointed out many times that this latter
definition should be done with :=, or else bdeps
will end up gulping whatever rdeps gets throughout
the rest of the port and infrastructure.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share/pear/Services/Yadis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share/pear/Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share/pear/Auth/OpenID
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share/pear/Auth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share/pear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] %%EXAMPLESDIR%%/server/lib/render
[EMAIL PROTECTED] %%EXAMPLESDIR%%/server/lib
[EMAIL PROTECTED] %%EXAMPLESDIR%%/server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] %%EXAMPLESDIR%%/consumer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] %%EXAMPLESDIR%%
I assume the pear dirs were dirrmtried with expectation
of other (newer) pear ports installing in the same
location. But why examplesdir? It's completely port-
specific.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"