On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:33:09PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:21:27 -0500 > "Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> Add a hack to fix a lot of hardcore paths of /usr/X11R6 to fix the > > >> >>problem for > > >> >> users that do not have symlink of /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local when they > > >> >>have gdm > > >> >> enable in the startup. Bump the PORTREVISION. > > >> >> Reported by: Werner Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> >FYI NOP changes like this shouldn't get PORTREVISION bumps. > > >> It needs to be bump for the package and other users that do not have > > >> symlink of /usr/X11R6 -> /usr/local. I do not want to do it by manual or > > >> add in UPDATING for tell them to reinstall it. > > > It's not a supported configuration to run without the symlink. > > > It is a good idea to fix remaining instances of /usr/X11R6 over time, > > > but these are NOP changes and should not get PORTREVISION bumps. > > Ok next time, I won't bump and will imaging it as a 'NOP' change. I feel > > dirt to do this. > > I don't think that this change is NOP. I was embarrassed with > this problem, too. I did clean-install all ports such as Werner. > So I'm grad to get fixed binary by mezz's bumping PORTREVISION.
Then the question you should be asking is "why did the symlink creation by xorg-libraries not happen?". Kris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
