On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:01:38PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > From what the maintainer told me it was just a fix to remove an > unnecessary check that was causing the configure script to fail. > Presumably you also verified this yourself by checking the diff. If > not, you were supposed to. > If so, then it clearly falls under the cases in which portrevision > should not be bumped. In particular rerolling the distfile does not > automatically require a bump. ok, I got it.
thanks. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
