Thanks!
I was pretty sure that the ``visual kernel configuartion'' was an
antique, but I didn't have access to a &os; box when I was looking at
it.
By the way, I also noticed that (at least in one chapter) we mix
together using a literal ``FreeBSD'' and ``&os;''; the example I
counted was approx 150 FreeBSD and 50 &os; -- is there a reason to
prefer one to the other? The comment in freebsd.ent points out that
they are very unlikely to be different, but would we really only want
to turn some instances into links?
It's probably not worth the repo-churn to make them consistent, I'm
just curious.
-Ben Kaduk
On 6/30/07, Chin-San Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
chinsan 2007-06-30 18:12:31 UTC
FreeBSD doc repository
Modified files:
en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook Makefile txtfiles.ent
en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml
Log:
- Update the deprecated section about "Visual kernel configuration".
- Attach the newly screenshot of country-config for FreeBSD 6.2 -R and later.
Revision Changes Path
1.106 +1 -0 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/Makefile
1.350 +30 -51 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install/chapter.sgml
1.4 +1 -0 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/txtfiles.ent
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
