On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:43:18AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >>Not sure this can work reliably enough to be usefule at present, at > >> least for > >>the specific scenario of avoiding unnecessary recompilations. I think > >>there > >>are just too many ports with implicit dependencies, especially in the > >>KDE/GNOME domain. > > That's a bug in those ports IMHO. And that's the reason why this > feature is not enabled by default. > > >Yes. I'm not even convinced this feature is a good idea. > > "Not a good idea" as in "is not usable yet" or as in "it should never > be the goal to be usable"? If it is the former, I agree (see above). > If it is the later please elaborate (having correct dependency > information should always be a good idea, I think the benefits are > obvious, aren't they?).
Both: we're not there yet, and I don't see why this implementation is the best way to get there :) Did I miss your discussion of the proposal? Kris _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
