* The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070820 11:59] wrote: > > Just for the record here, I think that Scott did bring up a very valid point > in > what he had said ... Kris did mention 'PC-BSD including it even if FreeBSD > didn't' (or words to that effect), and Scott's response was only meant (at > least the way I had read it) to bring us back into focus that we are better > to > come up with a BSD solution vs risking further forking of code ... > > Please note that in all of this dicussion, it is only been recent that > someone > mentioned a 'kld solution', which I think would be cool ... > > I do think that the 'mud slinging' at Scott was quite out of place ...
There was no mud being slung, threatening someone with a fork because they choose to go with a kld until the developers can accept a new call (that exists in just about every other OS)... whatever dude. I suggested the kld by the way. -Alfred _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
