On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:17:30 -0400
"Ben Kaduk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 8/22/07, Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > trhodes     2007-08-22 21:29:38 UTC
> >
> >   FreeBSD doc repository
> >
> >   Modified files:
> >     en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/audit chapter.sgml
> >   Log:
> >   Remove duplicate word.
> >
> >   Found by:       ds
> >
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.29      +1 -1      doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/audit/chapter.sgml
> 
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ requirements. -->
>        <listitem>
>       <para><filename>audit_event</filename> - Textual names and
>         descriptions of system audit events, as well as a list of which
> -       classes each event in in.</para>
> +       classes each event in.</para>
>        </listitem>
> 
> Isn't that a typo, not a duplicate word (i.e. ``in in'' ==> ``is in'')?

Re-reading it, I guess it does make more sense to say ``is in''
and I will be reading this chapter over again soon.  It will
be fixed along with whatever else I find.  Thanks,

-- 
Tom Rhodes
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to