On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
novel 2007-09-02 11:08:10 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
security/gnupg Makefile
Log:
Add RUN_DEPEND on security/pinentry because gpg is almost useless
without it.
PR: 115760 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115760
Submitted by: novel
Approved by: maintainer timeout (1 week, linimon ok)
Revision Changes Path
1.106 +2 -1 ports/security/gnupg/Makefile
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/gnupg/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.105&r2=1.106&f=h
I don't think this is a good idea for a few reasons. First off, the gnupg
port already has a pkg-message that is pretty clear about the fact that
you need to pick a pinentry dialog. Second, I don't think that the
pinentry port itself is a good choice in its current state. I just did a
quick test and as far as I can tell it seems to want to build all of them,
which means depending on QT3, and GTK 1 and 2.
I sort of think that this might be reasonable if the pinentry port grew
OPTIONS, which I would even be willing to work on if lofi thought it was a
good idea. But I don't think the overhead of drawing all of the dialogs in
is worth it, and I don't see an easy way of guessing which one the user
would want by default.
Can this change be backed out till there has been a little discussion?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
