Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 9/18/07, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-09-18 00:12, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/18/07, Gabor Kovesdan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas escribi??:
keramida 2007-09-17 21:02:43 UTC
FreeBSD doc repository
Modified files:
en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap article.sgml
Log:
Avoid using "It was", but use a more explicit reference to the
version-guide article in the abstract of 5-roadmap. This way
the text is a bit less confusing.
Shouldn't this be nuked? I remember it came to the topic some time ago,
but we won't have
any new releases from 5.X any more and it has only a historical
significance.
When you go on and keep reading, and follow the links you feel the 5.x
task isn't completed yet, and I feel it's misleading, I would suggest
you make docs for FreeBSD 7.x Road Map or even 8.x
That's odd. After reading this in the current abstract:
<para> This document is now mostly of historical value. It
presented a roadmap for the development of &os;'s &t.releng.5;
branch. It was originally written in February 2003 (between
the 5.0 and 5.1 releases), and was intended to provide a plan
for making the &t.releng.5; branch <quote>stable</quote>, both
in terms of code quality and finalization of various
APIs/ABIs. For a different perspective, the article
<ulink url="&url.articles.version-guide;">
<quote>Choosing the &os; Version That Is Right For You</quote>
</ulink>
may be of interest. The version-guide article was written in August
2005 (two and a half years later), and it contains a section
discussing how these plans and events actually unfolded, as well as
some lessons learned.</para>
it was obvious to me that the article is *not* describing the current
state of affairs. Any suggestions about improving the text to make it
less confusing for people who just happen to stumble upon it now, are
very welcome :)
I think if you change the title itself it will be good idea.
The Road Map for 5-STABLE to The Road Map for 5-STABLE ( historical value )
AS the author of this blasted document, I'll ask that 1) you stop
arguing about nit-picky points about it, 2) don't change the title, and
3) stop attaching so much significance to it.
Thanks =-)
Scott
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
