On 9/30/07, Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > >> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:25:08 -0400 > >> From: "Ben Kaduk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> On 9/29/07, Garance A Drosehn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > >>> > >>> Does this mean that I should not switch to ULE on my single-CPU PowerPC > >>> mini-Mac? > >>> > >> > >> I was under the impression that BSD is preferred to ULE for > >> single-processor > >> systems, irregardless of the processor architecture. > > > > YMMV, but ULE seems to generally work better then 4BSD for interactive > > uniprocessor systems. The preferred scheduler for uniprocessor servers > > is less clear, but many test have shown ULE does better for those > > systems in the majority of cases. > > I feel it's safe to say desktop behavior on UP is definitely superior. I > think there is no significant difference on UP between 4BSD and ULE except > perhaps in context switching microbenchmarks where ULE falls behind. >
I'm glad to be corrected. Thanks for all the great work, Jeff! -Ben Kaduk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
