On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:28:19AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:22:22AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >P.S. I'm starting to get a bit frustrated about the whole X.org 7.x > >thing. With every release of it, something gets broken, and nothing > >gets fixed. > > I'll second that. IMO, 7.3 is a regression on 7.2 in both reliability > and functionality. The underlying problem seems to be that X.org are > no longer doing any integration testing: They produce several hundred > software packages but don't bother confirming that they actually work.
Ditto. x11@, how feasible is using our current Ports Collection with XFree86 as X implementation? I'd like to propose extending deprecation date for XFree86-4 or even allow the latter to be an officially supported X implementation for a time being (until X.org guys prove they actually *can* develop stable software). ./danfe _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
