On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > and I are saying about having a justification for changes. .. > The ctype ABI change > isn't like that at all; it's mandatory and it can't be > worked around. We also asked that even justifiable changes be evaluated > to see if there was any work-around to avoid breakage. Several have > already been suggested for the ctype change.
Certainly implementing something in an alternate way that doesn't cause an forward incompatibility in RELENG_* is a Good Thing and should be strived for. It is nice that in this case it looks like we have this choice of implementations. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
