On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Alexander Kabaev wrote:

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:08:10 +0000 (UTC)
David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

das         2007-12-14 03:08:10 UTC

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:
    lib/msun             Symbol.map
  Log:
  Typo in previous commit

  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.6       +2 -2      src/lib/msun/Symbol.map

http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/lib/msun/Symbol.map.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6

This is just wrong IMHO. New exported symbols should not be introduced
carelessly and certainly not should be added to the same namespace that
exists in 7.0. Either we add these to 7.0 before it releases, or they
should go into their own section which will start collecting all new
libc symbols to appear in 8.0.

Daniel, Yar - what is your take on this?

I think we reached some sort of consensus that the namespace would be
bumped for every release...?  So unless these get added to 7.0 before
it goes out the door, they should be put in a separate namespace.

On the other hand, newly added symbols don't break the ABI.  I
don't think there is a technical reason why symbols can't be
added to FBSD_1.0 in -current; they can be easily backported
to 7.0.  If you were to add them to FBSD_1.1 in -current, then
at a later time backport them to 7.0, then you would have to
create a new namespace (FBSD_1.1) in 7.0 in order to add them.
The only thing this buys you is being able to tell in what
version they originated.  Perhaps that's reason enough?

At a minimum, we need to create one new namespace in each
release branched from -current when there is one or more
ABI changes from the prior release.  Perhaps we should just
move to FBSD_1.1 now in 8-current just to make things easier.
When we go to 9-current, we move to FBSD_1.2, etc.  If you
need to backport changes back to 7.x, then you also have to
create the matching version in 7.x.

--
DE
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to