On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:26:20PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Colin Percival wrote: > > Is there a standard policy for when a port's source code should be included > > in > > the ports tree instead of in a separate distfile which is fetched on demand? > > I actually do not know if there is a codified policy, but I have two > original works in the ports tree so I'll share my thought process. > > The first criterion I used was, "Is it directly related to FreeBSD, > and only FreeBSD?"
There's never been a discussion of a policy IIRC. I suppose that if something is of significant size but is FreeBSD-only, it might be a candidate for our (underused) projects/ repo. mcl _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
