On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 04:06:19PM +0100, Alastair Reid wrote: > These names sound reasonable. The name 'base' occurs to me instead of > 'core' but either is good.
It's not base, it's base + haskell98 + haskell-src (+ network later), i.e. what the documentation calls the "Haskell Core Libraries". An alternative would be a separate directory for each of these, at the cost of a long path. But maybe a packages directory doesn't make sense until Hugs has a bit of package support. > btw Should the files in hugs98/libraries/Hugs which come from CVS be > moving into the libraries repository just as there's a bunch of GHC > specific stuff in libraries/GHC? (That is, should this not be a > subdirectory of hugs98.) I thought of that, but these modules are fairly closely tied to the Hugs sources, mainly via Hugs primitives. > This is probably what you were talking about when you said there was > a little cleanup needed which could wait until after release... That was more eliminating code duplication, and possibly using some form of your prelude-splitting patch to remove special cases. _______________________________________________ Cvs-hugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-hugs
