On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:01:38AM +0000, Ross Paterson wrote: > I sympathize with your concern, but I'm a bit reluctant to have Hugs > pretending to provide things that it really doesn't handle. > I think it's better > to make programmers explicitly aware of such shortcomings rather that > let their programs compile and then not work. > > How about abstracting the problematic bits in Network.Socket as functions > wrapped in #ifdef __HUGS__, but inside that module?
Yes, that would concentrate the #ifdefs where they won't hurt. Volker (in his own #ifdef-hell) -- Volker Stolz * http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ * PGP * S/MIME _______________________________________________ Cvs-hugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-hugs
