Simon Marlow wrote:
What brought on this sudden desire to clean up our autoconf stuff, BTW?

Masochism? ;-)


It's greatly appreciated, anyway.

I wonder if the autoconf scripts can be modularised at all; e.g. move a
lot of the stuff that is only used by GHC into GHC's configure.in (oops
configure.ac).

That's my master plan, especially for the libraries: Every package should have its own autoconf magic, decoupling things quite a bit. Additionally, it avoids duplicating the autoconf effort in Hugs. Perhaps NHC can use this eventually, too.

I suppose that might mean that we would need two separate config.h's.

Not two, but many, I guess.


Cheers,
   S.


_______________________________________________ Cvs-fptools mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-fptools

Reply via email to