On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:26:50PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: > No, I wouldn't recommend that as printed documentation is still > best handled via docbook-utils & jade rather than docbook-xsl > (unless someone has happy (&stable) stories to tell re: XSL-FO > processing..) > > What to do? I believe jade will complain, but continue, if > xref's are closed using </xref>, so that's a hacky way out.
How about a simple %.xml: %.sgml rule in the Makefile (with something special for the root)? _______________________________________________ Cvs-hugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-hugs
