[...] Ideally, the new package would be sold to the MTL users as a replacement for the old one, which would then disappear.
We could keep the old one for backwards compatibility, see below.
[...] When the new package is ready for use,
What's missing?
a next step might be dropping the Unstable prefix from the module names of the monads package [...]
Definitively. :-)
[...] But the major part would be the negotiations with MTL users. [...]
Well, it's a bit hard to negotiate with an unknown user base. I propose to make the new monad package the default (= auto package) in the next GHC release, but at the same time keeping the old mtl package (which would be non-auto then) for people who still want it. Or are there technical problems with this approach? Hmmm, Hugs has no package concept...
Cheers, S.
_______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
