Yes, with a couple of caveats:
- test performance first
- if a BSD-licensed CPP turns up, we might consider using that instead
Cheers,
Simon
On 28 September 2004 17:50, Sven Panne wrote:
> That reminds me of the fact that we should probably include hscpp in
> our GHC from HEAD...
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Haskell] hscpp
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:51:50 +0100
> From: Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Dept of Computer Science, University of York
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> there was some discussion about a Haskell-friendly CPP a while ago.
>> What happend to this project? I desperately need such a
>> preprocessor.
>
> It is called cpphs, and is currently at version 0.7. I think it
> is feature-complete now, and has behaviour highly compatible with
> cpp -traditional. In particular, it avoids the problems introduced
> in gcc-3.x's cpp.
>
> http://haskell.org/cpphs/
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cvs-ghc mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
